It's fairly safe to trust information you find through the library. The types of resources found through Seneca Libraries have been reviewed several times for quality and accuracy of information. However, you may still need to evaluate the library resource to make sure that it's relevant to your topic and matches the assignment requirements.
If you're using websites and other Internet sources in your assignment, it's important to evaluate these online sources for quality and credibility. How do you know what is trustworthy? One way to check for accuracy and reliability of information is to apply the CRAAP test.
CRAAP stands for Currency, Relevancy, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. Check out the following questions that you could ask yourself when evaluating different sources.
Criteria | Things to consider |
---|---|
Currency |
|
Relevance |
|
Authority |
|
Accuracy |
|
Purpose |
|
Icons: schedule | puzzle | verified account | search | information by Freepik from flaticon.com
During Winter 2021 semester, a student was researching the impacts of COVID-19 on college students for their research essay. They were permitted to use credible sources from websites. After Googling their topic, they found an article online which appeared to be a suitable source. Here's how they evaluated the article using the CRAAP test:
Open the article in a new window
Currency | The article was published in November 24, 2020. Considering that COVID-19 was a new and evolving topic during the time the student was writing the essay, this passed the Currency part of the CRAAP test. |
---|---|
Relevance | The student was writing about the impacts of COVID-19 on college students. The article discussed one of impacts of the pandemic on college students which is stress. The article also discussed the effects of pandemic stress to students' mental health, and the preliminary results from the authors' research study. Considering that the source contained relevant information, this would pass the Relevancy part of the CRAAP test. |
Authority |
The article was authored by academics from Carleton University's Department of Neuroscience. Given this information, it would be reasonable to say that they are qualified to write about the topic. The article was published in the website The Conversation Canada, which publishes news and articles written by academics. On the Who We Are and Our Charter pages on the website, information was provided on the site's history and publishing standards. Based on the information on these pages, it would be reasonable to say that they are a reputable website. Considering that the source and authors are authoritative, this would pass the Authority part of the CRAAP test. |
Accuracy | The authors referenced many sources in their article to support their discussion. The majority of the references were for peer-reviewed research articles from academic journals. The links to the sources were also active and can be accessed. Based on this information, the article passed the Accuracy part of the CRAAP test. |
Purpose | The main purpose of the article is to inform. No bias was observed and the authors provided mostly facts and data about the topic. The article passed the Purpose part of the CRAAP test. |